[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path
    On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Rohit Seth wrote:
    > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 15:18 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > Right. Extra flush_icache_page routines will add cost to archs that
    > have non-null definition of this routine. BTW, isn't flush_icache_page
    > marked for deprecation?

    Yes, flush_icache_page is marked for deprecation: but that's hardly
    a reason to add another under a different name! (Not quite what you
    did, but...)

    > lazy_mmu_prot_update was added specifically for notifying change in
    > protection. So, in a way it is closer to update_mmu_cache (Which is for
    > change in mappings itself). Though for ia64 implementation, this ends
    > up flushing the icaches when needed.

    The ia64 implementation is the only one which has any use for it, and
    it's only interested when it's executable i.e. "lazy_mmu_prot_update"
    is a name concealing some overdesign.

    > Hopefully my reply is useful.

    Yes, thanks Rohit, and I'll want to read through it again later.
    In particular, I've now a better idea what's "lazy" about it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-28 07:37    [W:0.020 / U:0.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site