lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.21
    Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
    []
    > We've got stable series.
    > With KNOWN_PROBLEMS information, sysadmins can decide if they can
    > safely upgrade to .0 or if they have to wait for .123. Pressing
    > the responsible people to fix the problems in .123 (would) help
    > it greatly.

    For how long you plan to maintain 2.6.x.y -stable series for each
    2.6.x release? The thing is that tehere will probably be NO
    .123 "revision" (with maybe the exception of 2.6.16, thanks to
    Adrian again). The end result is that there will be just no stable
    kernels *at all*. because when the next 2.6.x will start looking
    more or less useful due to 2.6.x.y series, there will be new 2.6.x+1,
    and work with 2.6.x stops...

    It's not the case currently, but this way ("let's fix the bugs
    in 2.6.x.y -stable series, don't bother releasing 2.6.x in a good
    shape"), we can finally come to the above situation...

    /mjt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-27 19:19    [W:0.021 / U:60.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site