Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge) | From | Johannes Berg <> | Date | Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:49:51 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:39 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Good point. Though if we go for passing the interrupt-enable setting as > an argument then many drivers will have the same > "if (irqs_disabled()) return" code. Hm. I guess passing it isn't even > strictly necessary.
Eh, the point I actually wanted to make is that many drivers don't care for the irqs disabled case and would have to add code to exclude it.
johannes [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |