![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:50 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> (And guess what, it uses APM and suspend is really faster and way more >>> reliable than each kernel implementation I could try). >> If you tried Suspend2 and had problems with reliability, please send me >> logs. I'll do all I can to help. (I have to qualify it a bit, because >> I'm not able to fix drivers, but if it's a Suspend2 issue, tell me and >> I'll fix it). > > Does suspend2 work with APM ? After much trying, I think now the ACPI > implementation of my laptop (a vintage Compaq Armada 1700) is busted, > only APM works. > > AFAIR the problem with suspend2 was that it didn't poweroff some parts > of the laptop (the led of the wifi pcmcia card was on, and the lcd light > was on too), but that was last year. Kernel's suspend kind of worked but > didn't resume (no reaction on button press). As I tried all this last > year, I may have forgotten some things. > Honestly, I like this laptop when it works flawlessly, so I don't see > many reasons to try *susp* again. I'll do it when I'm bored, just not > today. > Actually on some old laptops I just use the apm command, with -s (or -S, I forget by now), and that works. -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-26 20:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||