[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

> > That's where I started: whole "suspend to disk" thing actually has _more_
> > to do with "shutdown" than with "suspend".
> From looking at pm_ops which I was recently working with a lot, it seems
> that it was designed by somebody who was reading the ACPI documentation
> and was otherwise pretty clueless, even at that level std tries to look
> like suspend. IMHO that is one of the first things that should be ripped
> out, no pm_ops for STD, it's a pain to work with.

That code goes back to Patrick, AFAICT. (And yes, ACPI S3 and ACPI S4
low-level enter is pretty similar).

Patches would be welcome, as would be "suspend-to-ram maintainer".
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-26 13:33    [W:0.429 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site