[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

    > > That's where I started: whole "suspend to disk" thing actually has _more_
    > > to do with "shutdown" than with "suspend".
    > From looking at pm_ops which I was recently working with a lot, it seems
    > that it was designed by somebody who was reading the ACPI documentation
    > and was otherwise pretty clueless, even at that level std tries to look
    > like suspend. IMHO that is one of the first things that should be ripped
    > out, no pm_ops for STD, it's a pain to work with.

    That code goes back to Patrick, AFAICT. (And yes, ACPI S3 and ACPI S4
    low-level enter is pretty similar).

    Patches would be welcome, as would be "suspend-to-ram maintainer".
    (cesky, pictures)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-26 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:3.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site