Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:30:05 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) |
| |
Hi!
> > That's where I started: whole "suspend to disk" thing actually has _more_ > > to do with "shutdown" than with "suspend". > > From looking at pm_ops which I was recently working with a lot, it seems > that it was designed by somebody who was reading the ACPI documentation > and was otherwise pretty clueless, even at that level std tries to look > like suspend. IMHO that is one of the first things that should be ripped > out, no pm_ops for STD, it's a pain to work with.
That code goes back to Patrick, AFAICT. (And yes, ACPI S3 and ACPI S4 low-level enter is pretty similar).
Patches would be welcome, as would be "suspend-to-ram maintainer". Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |