Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:44:03 +0200 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 |
| |
* Li, Tong N <tong.n.li@intel.com> wrote:
> [...] A corollary of this is that if both threads i and j are > continuously runnable with fixed weights in the time interval, then > the ratio of their CPU time should be equal to the ratio of their > weights. This definition is pretty restrictive since it requires the > properties to hold for any thread in any interval, which is not > feasible. [...]
yes, it's a pretty strong definition, but also note that while it is definitely not easy to implement, the solution is nevertheless feasible in my opinion and there exists a scheduler that implements it: CFS.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |