[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 07:23 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > I absolutely detest all suspend-to-disk crap. Quite frankly, I hate the
    > > whole thing. I think they've _all_ caused problems for the "true" suspend
    > > (suspend-to-ram), and the last thing I want to see is three or four
    > Well, it is a bit more complex than that.
    > suspend-to-disk is a workaround for
    > 'suspend-to-ram eats too much power' (plus some details like
    > being able to replace battery).
    > suspend-to-ram is a workaround for
    > 'idle machine takes way too much power' (plus some details
    > like don't spin the disk so that machine is safe to carry).

    I think it depends on who you ask. I personally think that suspend-to-
    $youchoose is a workaround for the slowness of system startup. I never
    turn off my laptop, I just suspend it.

    (And guess what, it uses APM and suspend is really faster and way more
    reliable than each kernel implementation I could try).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-25 10:53    [W:0.019 / U:96.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site