Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:13:09 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 |
| |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:58:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Adjustments to the lag computation for for arrivals and departures > during execution are among the missing pieces. Some algorithmic devices > are also needed to account for the varying growth rates of lags of tasks > waiting to run, which arise from differing priorities/weights.
that was the principle of my proposal of sorting tasks by expected completion time and using +/- credit to compensate for too large/too short slice used.
Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |