lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
Andi Kleen wrote:
> For me you don't need anymore, but possibly for others.
>

Hm. I'm not a fan of the great big monolithic patch myself, but on the
other hand I don't like the idea of patches which are not self-contained
steps from working->working state. Xen-core.patch is currently the
(more or less) minimal set of stuff which needs to be in place to get
working Xen guest up, and so from that perspective I don't think there's
a good way of splitting it up.

> To summarize the outstanding issues are:
> - fixing sched_clock first
>

What was the sched_clock problem? I don't remember and outstanding
issues with it. I noticed you didn't take paravirt-sched_clock.

> - hopefully more review of the core pieces by others
> - what i commented (minor stuff mostly)
>

I just rebased onto your newest patches, so I'll address your comments
and repost.

> - review of xenbus and drivers

Yes, not much response there.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-25 22:07    [W:0.081 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site