[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog

    * Daniel Walker <> wrote:

    > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 13:24 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    > > And sched_clock's use of local_irq_save/restore appears to be absolutely
    > > correct, so I think it must be triggering a bug in either the self-tests
    > > or lockdep itself.
    > Why does sched_clock need to disable interrupts?

    i concur. To me it appears not "absolutely correct" that someone
    apparently added local_irq_save/restore to sched_clock(), but "absolute
    madness". sched_clock() is _very_ performance-sensitive for the
    scheduler, do not mess with it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-24 23:03    [W:0.020 / U:101.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site