[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog

* Daniel Walker <> wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 13:24 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > And sched_clock's use of local_irq_save/restore appears to be absolutely
> > correct, so I think it must be triggering a bug in either the self-tests
> > or lockdep itself.
> Why does sched_clock need to disable interrupts?

i concur. To me it appears not "absolutely correct" that someone
apparently added local_irq_save/restore to sched_clock(), but "absolute
madness". sched_clock() is _very_ performance-sensitive for the
scheduler, do not mess with it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 23:03    [W:0.090 / U:2.972 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site