lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I said that because the damn thing went away when I was hunting it down
> because I lost the config and was unable to remember the right combination
> of debug settings. Fortunately it later came back so I took care to
> preserve the config.
>

sched_clock doesn't *do* anything except flap interrupts. Oh, wait, have
you got Andi's bugfixed version of the sched_clock patch? The first
version did a local_save_flags rather than a local_irq_save.

>> Hm, is it caused by using sched_clock() to generate the printk
>> timestamps while generating the lock test output?
>>
>
> Conceivably. What does that locking API test do?
>

Didn't make a difference here. Building your config now.

> I was using printk timestamps and netconsole at the time.
>

Ah, great, now you're going to make me setup netconsole...

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 20:19    [W:0.045 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site