[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
    Chris Friesen wrote:
    > Rogan Dawes wrote:
    >> I guess my point was if we somehow get to an odd number of
    >> nanoseconds, we'd end up with rounding errors. I'm not sure if your
    >> algorithm will ever allow that.
    > And Ingo's point was that when it takes thousands of nanoseconds for a
    > single context switch, an error of half a nanosecond is down in the noise.
    > Chris

    My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with
    a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually
    we'll lose them all.

    Some folks have uptimes of multiple years.

    Of course, I could (very likely!) be full of it! ;-)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-24 17:11    [W:0.019 / U:39.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site