[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
Chris Friesen wrote:
> Rogan Dawes wrote:
>> I guess my point was if we somehow get to an odd number of
>> nanoseconds, we'd end up with rounding errors. I'm not sure if your
>> algorithm will ever allow that.
> And Ingo's point was that when it takes thousands of nanoseconds for a
> single context switch, an error of half a nanosecond is down in the noise.
> Chris

My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with
a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually
we'll lose them all.

Some folks have uptimes of multiple years.

Of course, I could (very likely!) be full of it! ;-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 17:11    [W:0.077 / U:3.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site