[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
    On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >* Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
    >> yeah, i guess this has little to do with X. I think in your scenario
    >> it might have been smarter to either stop, or to renice the workloads
    >> that took away CPU power from others to _positive_ nice levels.
    >> Negative nice levels can indeed be dangerous.
    >btw., was X itself at nice 0 or nice -10 when the lockup happened?
    > Ingo

    Memory could be hazy Ingo, but I think X was at 0 when that occurred.

    Cheers, Gene
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
    soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
    -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
    I use technology in order to hate it more properly.
    -- Nam June Paik
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-24 16:43    [W:0.021 / U:1.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site