Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kthread: Enhance kthread_stop to abort interruptible sleeps | Date | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:30:22 -0600 |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:13:13 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > wrote: > >> This patch reworks kthread_stop so it is more flexible and it causes >> the target kthread to abort interruptible sleeps. Allowing a larger >> class of kernel threads to use to the kthread API. >> >> The changes start by defining TIF_KTHREAD_STOP on all architectures. >> TIF_KTHREAD_STOP is a per process flag that I can set from another >> process to indicate that a kernel thread should stop. >> >> wake_up_process in kthread_stop has been replaced by signal_wake_up >> ensuring that the kernel thread if sleeping is woken up in a timely >> manner and with TIF_SIGNAL_PENDING set, which causes us to break out >> of interruptible sleeps. >> >> recalc_signal_pending was modified to keep TIF_SIGNAL_PENDING set for >> as long as TIF_KTHREAD_STOP is set. >> >> Arbitrary paths to do_exit are now allowed. I have placed a >> completion on the thread stack and pointed vfork_done at it, when the >> mm_release is called from do_exit the completion will be called. >> Since the completion is stored on the stack it is important that >> kthread() now calls do_exit ensuring the stack frame that holds the >> completion is never released, and so that our exit_code is certain to >> make it unchanged all the way to do_exit. >> >> To allow kthread_stop to read the process exit code when exit_mm wakes >> it up I have moved the setting of exit_code to the beginning of >> do_exit. > > This patch causes this oops: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000508.jpg > with this config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-x.txt
Thanks. If I am reading the oops properly this happened during bootup and vfork_done was set to NULL?
The NULL vfork_done is really weird as exec is the only thing that sets vfork_done to NULL.
Either I've got a stupid bug in there somewhere or we have just found the weirdest memory stomp. I will take a look and see if I can reproduce this shortly.
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |