lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
    On 4/22/07, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
    >> I'm just looking for what people want the API to be here. With that in
    >> hand we can just go out and do whatever needs to be done.

    On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > I think a sched_yield_to is one interface:
    > int sched_yield_to(pid_t);

    All clear on that front.


    On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > For futex(), the extension is needed for the FUTEX_WAIT operation. We
    > need a new operation FUTEX_WAIT_FOR or so which takes another (the
    > fourth) parameter which is the PID of the target.
    > For FUTEX_LOCK_PI we need no extension. The futex value is the PID of
    > the current owner. This is required for the whole interface to work
    > in the first place.

    We'll have to send things out and see what sticks here. There seems to
    be some pickiness above.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-22 10:59    [W:0.021 / U:1.532 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site