[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On 4/22/07, William Lee Irwin III <> wrote:
>> I'm just looking for what people want the API to be here. With that in
>> hand we can just go out and do whatever needs to be done.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I think a sched_yield_to is one interface:
> int sched_yield_to(pid_t);

All clear on that front.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> For futex(), the extension is needed for the FUTEX_WAIT operation. We
> need a new operation FUTEX_WAIT_FOR or so which takes another (the
> fourth) parameter which is the PID of the target.
> For FUTEX_LOCK_PI we need no extension. The futex value is the PID of
> the current owner. This is required for the whole interface to work
> in the first place.

We'll have to send things out and see what sticks here. There seems to
be some pickiness above.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-22 10:59    [W:0.106 / U:2.888 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site