Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:48:43 -0700 | | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | | Subject | Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 |
| |
On 4/22/07, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote: >> I'm just looking for what people want the API to be here. With that in >> hand we can just go out and do whatever needs to be done.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I think a sched_yield_to is one interface: > int sched_yield_to(pid_t);
All clear on that front.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:17:31AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > For futex(), the extension is needed for the FUTEX_WAIT operation. We > need a new operation FUTEX_WAIT_FOR or so which takes another (the > fourth) parameter which is the PID of the target. > For FUTEX_LOCK_PI we need no extension. The futex value is the PID of > the current owner. This is required for the whole interface to work > in the first place.
We'll have to send things out and see what sticks here. There seems to be some pickiness above.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |