lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
Date
On Apr 22, 2007, at 17:39:59, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver

I think you really meant: "Use mutex instead of binary semaphore in
idt77252 driver", since this is a binary semaphore (not a mutex,
which are always binary):
> - struct semaphore mutex;

and this is a mutex, not a spinlock:
> + struct mutex mutex;

Everything else looks good though

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-23 01:53    [W:0.098 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site