Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:55:25 -0400 | | From | Mark Lord <> | | Subject | Re: Renice X for cpu schedulers |
| |
Nick Piggin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:17:25AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: >> Just plain "make" (no -j2 or -j9999) is enough to kill interactivity >> on my 2GHz P-M single-core non-HT machine with SD. > > Is this with or without X reniced?
That was with no manual jiggling, everything the same as with stock kernels, except that stock kernels don't kill interactivity here.
>> But with the very first posted version of CFS by Ingo, >> I can do "make -j2" no problem and still have a nicely interactive destop. > > How well does cfs run if you have the granularity set to something > like 30ms (30000000)?
Dunno, I've put this stuff aside for now until things settle down. With four schedulers, and lots of patches / revisions / tuning-knobs, there's just no way to keep up with it all here.
Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |