Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:05 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream |
| |
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on: > > (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a > problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I > don't know about. > > (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work(). I suppose I could use > cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for > the timer completion function to finish.
There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them in for 2.6.22. I doubt if there's anything in there which directly affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against 2.6.21 might lead to grief. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |