lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
    On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
    David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

    > There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
    >
    > (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a
    > problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I
    > don't know about.
    >
    > (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work(). I suppose I could use
    > cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for
    > the timer completion function to finish.

    There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them
    in for 2.6.22. I doubt if there's anything in there which directly
    affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against
    2.6.21 might lead to grief.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-20 20:43    [W:2.602 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site