lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
Date
On Thursday 29 March 2007 21:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [ A quick guess: could SD's substandard interactivity in this test be
> due to the SMP migration logic inconsistencies Mike noticed? This is
> an SMP system and the hackbench workload is very scheduling intense
> and tasks are frequently queued from one CPU to another. ]

I assume you put it on and endless loop since hackbench 10 runs for .5 second
on my machine. Doubtful it's an SMP issue. update_if_moved should maintain
cross cpu scheduling decisions. The same slowdown would happen on UP and is
almost certainly due to the fact that hackbench 10 induces a load of _160_ on
the machine.

--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-03 03:11    [W:0.787 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site