Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:04:25 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices? |
| |
Anthony Liguori wrote: > The actual PCI bus could paravirtualized. It's just a question of > whether one reinvents a device discovery mechanism (like XenBus) or > whether one piggy backs on existing mechanisms. > > Furthermore, in the future, I strongly suspect that HVM will become > much more important for Xen than PV and since that already has a PCI > bus it's not really that big of a deal.
Well, obviously it keeps things simple for me to not worry about PCI support in Xen at this point. But I was thinking more of lguest; I think PCI emulation would kill puppies.
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |