[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Failure! Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues
    On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
    > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests
    > > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the
    > > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your
    > > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right?
    > The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4
    > request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has
    > occurred, or the server sends us garbage.

    I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree
    (895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your
    patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be.

    Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and
    apply your 5 patches and re-test.


    Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-19 23:53    [W:0.026 / U:42.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site