[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Failure! Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests
> > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the
> > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your
> > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right?
> The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4
> request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has
> occurred, or the server sends us garbage.

I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree
(895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your
patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be.

Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and
apply your 5 patches and re-test.


Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-19 23:53    [W:0.041 / U:1.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site