![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote: > > as usual, any sort of feedback, bugreports, fixes and suggestions > > are more than welcome, > > Pushed this through the test.kernel.org and nothing new blew up. > Notably the kernbench figures are within expectations even on the > bigger numa systems, commonly badly affected by balancing problems in > the schedular. thanks! Given the really low preemption latency/granularity default (roughly equivalent to 'timeslice length'), and that basically all of my focus was on interactivity characteristics, this is a pretty good result. I suspect it will be necessary to increase the default to 10 msecs (or more) to be on the safe side. (Nick has reported a 4% kernbench drop so for his kernbench workload it's needed.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-18 12:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||