Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:16:06 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2 |
| |
* William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > > > Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of > > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice > > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when > > determining what's fair. > > I suspect you mean > (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load in update_curr().
good idea, i'll try that.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |