[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)
>> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7:
>> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and
>> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the
>> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i
>> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of
> rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice
> value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining
> what's fair.

I suspect you mean (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load
in update_curr().

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-17 09:55    [W:0.150 / U:2.884 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site