lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)
    >> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7:
    >> http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.patch
    >> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and
    >> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the
    >> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i
    >> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.

    On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
    > Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of
    > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice
    > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining
    > what's fair.

    I suspect you mean (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load
    in update_curr().


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-17 09:55    [W:0.022 / U:0.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site