[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)
    >> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7:
    >> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and
    >> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the
    >> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i
    >> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.

    On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
    > Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of
    > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice
    > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining
    > what's fair.

    I suspect you mean (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load
    in update_curr().

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-17 09:55    [W:0.019 / U:4.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site