lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

    * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

    > > ok, i've got something better to test: i separated the delta out
    > > into a more finegrained stack of 3 patches. You can pick them up
    > > from:
    > >
    > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0.patch
    > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-preempt-fix.patch
    > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-child-runs-first.patch
    > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-misc.patch
    >
    > Isn't that easier for everyone if you keep them as quilt series (ala
    > syslets)?

    i _do_ have a quilt tree, but i never had the clean splitup above. Why?
    Because i worked on all of these aspects (and a whole lot of other
    aspects as well) in parallel during the past 2 days, back and forth,
    often mixing changes, etc. and there was never any clean splitup.

    Now it turned out that the clean splitup of -rc0->final delta would ease
    Gene's testing so i created it. Note that this is just 30% of the total
    v1->v2 delta and i just saved the work of having to do a clean splitup
    of the other 70%. (and note that this splitup will be undone because it
    makes no sense for any potential upstream merge at all, it's only to
    ease testing for Gene)

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-17 09:43    [W:0.058 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site