lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

* Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

> > ok, i've got something better to test: i separated the delta out
> > into a more finegrained stack of 3 patches. You can pick them up
> > from:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0.patch
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-preempt-fix.patch
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-child-runs-first.patch
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-misc.patch
>
> Isn't that easier for everyone if you keep them as quilt series (ala
> syslets)?

i _do_ have a quilt tree, but i never had the clean splitup above. Why?
Because i worked on all of these aspects (and a whole lot of other
aspects as well) in parallel during the past 2 days, back and forth,
often mixing changes, etc. and there was never any clean splitup.

Now it turned out that the clean splitup of -rc0->final delta would ease
Gene's testing so i created it. Note that this is just 30% of the total
v1->v2 delta and i just saved the work of having to do a clean splitup
of the other 70%. (and note that this splitup will be undone because it
makes no sense for any potential upstream merge at all, it's only to
ease testing for Gene)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-17 09:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site