lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 16:08 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
    > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > Ingo could have publicly spoken with them about his ideas of killing
    > > the O(1) scheduler and replacing it with an rbtree-based one, and using
    > > part of Bill's work to speed up development.
    >
    > He did exactly that and he did it with a patch. Nothing new here. This is
    > how development on LKML proceeds when you have two or more competing
    > designs. There's absolutely no need to get upset or hurt your feelings
    > over it. It's not malicious, it's how we do Linux development.

    Yes. Exactly. This is what it's all about, this is what makes it work.

    -Mike

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-15 19:35    [W:2.335 / U:0.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site