[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] revoke: add f_light flag for struct file
    On Friday 09 March 2007 11:43, Pekka Enberg wrote:
    > On 3/9/07, Eric Dumazet <> wrote:
    > > Cannot we use a flag in 'struct files_struct', set to one when the task
    > > is mono-thread (at task creation in fact), and set to 0 when it creates a
    > > new thread (or when someone remotely access to this "struct
    > > files_struct" in /proc/pid/fd/... )
    > How does that work? fget_light() has a built-in assumption that as
    > long as you don't share files_struct, it's okay not to take an extra
    > reference as current is only one doing close(2) and revoke(2) changes
    > that. So it's not really about being single-threaded or not.

    I just dropped one (silly ?) idea and expected you made the hard work :)

    Then just drop the fget_light() 'optimisation' and always take a reference
    (atomic on f_count) regardless of single-thread or not. Instead of dirtying
    f_light, just do the straightforward thing and be with it.

    (that is : fget_light() = fget() = no more keeping fput_needed everywhere, and
    convoluted things in some dark sides of the kernel.

    It will save some conditional branches and complexity, and you dont need this
    f_light thing.

    > On 3/9/07, Eric Dumazet <> wrote:
    > > Also, the thing is racy.
    > Aah, fget_light() indeed has a race window between fcheck_files() and
    > set_f_light().

    Yes, you see how hard it is to get this right.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-09 12:17    [W:0.022 / U:1.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site