[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n'
On Thursday 08 March 2007 19:49, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:37:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:44, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> > > In spite of kgdb, shouldn't it have that \n anyways in case some other code
> > > gets added in the future after the macro? Or are you saying that there should
> > > never be any code ever after that macro?
> >
> > Sure if there is mainline code added after that macro we add the \n.
> > But only if it makes sense to add code there, which it didn't in kgdb.
> Was that because with recent enough tools and config options there was
> enough annotations so GDB could finally figure out where things had
> stopped?

The x86 kernels are fully dwarf2 annotiated yes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 23:39    [W:0.058 / U:5.964 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site