[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
    On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:46:47 CST, "Serge E. Hallyn" said:
    > I think it should be done as both. The part which measures the
    > integrity of files should be an integrity subsystem. The part which
    > uses those results to either allow/refuse actions or take some other
    > action (i.e. shut down the system) should be an lsm.

    That would be good - the allow/deny parts, being security, can use the
    existing LSM hooks, and the integrity part can use the LIM hooks.

    Umm... wait a minute - *what* Linux Integrity Module hooks? :)
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-08 21:43    [W:0.031 / U:23.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site