lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 08 Mar 2007 08:24:04 +0100
FromEric Dumazet <>
SubjectRe: [patch] epoll use a single inode ...
Kyle Moffett a écrit :
> > Prefetching is also fairly critical on a Power4 or G5 PowerPC system as 
> they have a long memory latency; an L2-cache miss can cost 200+ cycles.  
> On such systems the "dcbt" prefetch instruction brings in a single 
> 128-byte cacheline and has no serializing effects whatsoever, making it 
> ideal for use in a linked-list-traversal inner loop.

OK, 200 cycles...

But what is the cost of the conditional branch you added in prefetch(x) ?

if (!x) return;
(correctly predicted or not, but do powerPC have a BTB ?)

About the NULL 'potential problem', maybe we could use a dummy nil (but 
mapped) object, and use its address in lists, ie compare for &nil instead of 
NULL. This would avoid :

- The conditional test in some prefetch() implementations
- The potential TLB problem with the NULL value.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 08:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2008