[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
    "Paul Menage" <> writes:

    > No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource
    > controllers hook off.

    I think implementation wise this tends to make sense.
    However it should have nothing to do with semantics.

    If we have a lot of independent resource controllers. Placing the
    pointer to their data structures directly in nsproxy instead of in
    task_struct sounds like a reasonable idea but it should not be user

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-08 00:21    [W:0.018 / U:53.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site