lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
    Date
    "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com> writes:

    > No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource
    > controllers hook off.

    I think implementation wise this tends to make sense.
    However it should have nothing to do with semantics.

    If we have a lot of independent resource controllers. Placing the
    pointer to their data structures directly in nsproxy instead of in
    task_struct sounds like a reasonable idea but it should not be user
    visible.

    Eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-08 00:21    [W:0.022 / U:0.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site