lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] swsusp: Disable nonboot CPUs before entering platform suspend
Date
On Wednesday, 7 March 2007 23:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Prevent the WARN_ON() in arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:init_low_mapping()
> > > > from triggering by disabling nonboot CPUs before we finally enter the platform
> > > > suspend.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > > ---
> > > > kernel/power/disk.c | 1 +
> > > > kernel/power/user.c | 2 +-
> > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static void power_down(suspend_disk_meth
> > > > switch(mode) {
> > > > case PM_DISK_PLATFORM:
> > > > if (pm_ops && pm_ops->enter) {
> > > > + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> > > > kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > break;
> > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ static int snapshot_ioctl(struct inode *
> > > >
> > > > case PMOPS_ENTER:
> > > > if (data->platform_suspend) {
> > > > + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> > > > kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > error = pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > - error = 0;
> > > > }
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > Is this considered 2.6.21 material? If so why?
> >
> > Well, the WARN_ON() in arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:init_low_mapping()
> > triggers every time an SMP x86_64 box is suspended to disk using the platform
> > mode (default), which is quite annoying IMHO and users think something wrong is
> > going on. This will probably cause them to report the problem and I'd rather
> > like to avoid handling these reports. ;-)
>
> I do not quite like the patch (explanation in separate mail). Can we
> remove the WARN_ON() ? ;-).

Yes, if you can tell me why it's there. :-)

Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 00:17    [W:0.091 / U:1.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site