[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
    On 3/7/07, Serge E. Hallyn <> wrote:
    > All that being said, if it were going to save space without overly
    > complicating things I'm actually not opposed to using nsproxy, but it

    If space-saving is the main issue, then the latest version of my
    containers patches uses just a single pointer in the task_struct, and
    all tasks in the same set of containers (across all hierarchies) will
    share a single container_group object, which holds the actual pointers
    to container state.

    Effectively, container_group is to container as nsproxy is to namespace.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-07 22:23    [W:0.024 / U:5.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site