![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 3/7/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > All that being said, if it were going to save space without overly > complicating things I'm actually not opposed to using nsproxy, but it If space-saving is the main issue, then the latest version of my containers patches uses just a single pointer in the task_struct, and all tasks in the same set of containers (across all hierarchies) will share a single container_group object, which holds the actual pointers to container state. Effectively, container_group is to container as nsproxy is to namespace. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-07 22:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||