![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:00:31PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > So we got several choices here. > > 1. Introduce the container abstraction as is in your patches > 2. Extend nsproxy somehow to represent hierarchies > 3. Let individual resource controllers that -actually- support > hierarchical resource management maintain hierarchy in their code. 3 is what I am following for the cpuset conversion (currently under test). -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-07 18:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||