[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] epoll use a single inode ...

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I would definitly *love* saving dentries for pipes (and sockets too), but how
> are you going to get the inode ?

Don't use an inode at all.

> pipes()/sockets() can use read()/write()/rw_verify_area() and thus need
> file->f_path.dentry->d_inode (so each pipe needs a separate dentry)

No, at least pipes could easily just use "file->f_private_data" instead.

Now, sockets really do want the inode (or it would be really really big
changes), but pipes really just want a "struct pipe_inode_info" pointer,
which we could hide away directly in the file descriptor itself.

That's what Davide already did (on my suggestion) for signalfd - there's a
*single* inode, and the real data is in the per-fd f_private_data.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-07 18:07    [W:0.101 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site