![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 3/7/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> wrote: > It makes sense in the first cpuset patch > (cpusets_using_containers.patch), but should be removed in the second > cpuset patch (multiuser_container.patch). In the 2nd patch, we use this > comparison: > > if (task_cs(p) != cs) > continue; > > cont variable introduced in the 1st patch essentially becomes unused > after 2nd patch. > Yes, you're right - it could be removed in the 3rd patch. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-07 17:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||