lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Xen & VMI?

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> > so trying to argue as if there was no ABI imposed on Linux by hiding
> > the Xen ABI behind paravirt_ops, and whistling into the air as if
> > nothing happened is misguided at best.
>
> How is the situation even slightly different with a unified hypervisor
> ABI?

1 sane ABI instead of 4 parallel ones? It's the same difference as the
difference between 300 system calls and 1200 system calls. Alot more
focus, alot more integration, alot less pain. Every time i change a
detail in Linux i have to update (and think about) 1 virtualization
aspect - not 4 (or more).

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-06 22:23    [W:0.145 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site