lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Xen & VMI?
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
> yes - but de-facto contradicted by the Xen paravirt_ops patches sent to
> lkml ;)

There's no intrinsic value to the Xen on VMI approach that's superior
to Xen on pv_ops (not to mention the complications that it causes).

What are you driving at? You seem to be arguing that abstractions
are bad unless done via ABI's. ACPI....

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-06 20:49    [W:0.184 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site