Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:46:12 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: Xen & VMI? |
| |
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > yes - but de-facto contradicted by the Xen paravirt_ops patches sent to > lkml ;)
There's no intrinsic value to the Xen on VMI approach that's superior to Xen on pv_ops (not to mention the complications that it causes).
What are you driving at? You seem to be arguing that abstractions are bad unless done via ABI's. ACPI....
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |