lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromCon Kolivas <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: fix idle at tick
DateTue, 6 Mar 2007 18:41:08 +1100
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +1100 Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base.orig/kernel/sched.c	2007-03-06
> > 17:19:17.000000000 +1100 +++
> > linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base/kernel/sched.c	2007-03-06 17:20:40.000000000
> > +1100 @@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
> >
> >  	update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);
> >
> > -	if (idle_at_tick)
> > +	if (!idle_at_tick)
> >  		task_running_tick(rq, p);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	update_load(rq);
>
> Looks right, thanks.  The original patch had
>
> -	if (p == rq->idle)
> +	if (idle_at_tick)
>  		/* Task on the idle queue */
>  		wake_priority_sleeper(rq);
>  	else
>  		task_running_tick(rq, p);
>
> but it got damaged by smt-nice removal.

I gathered something like that happened. If it wasn't clear this change caused 
massive scheduler damage with no cpu accounting whatsoever occurring. I 
recommend putting it in your hotfixes/ dir if you're not planning an -mm2 
soon.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-06 08:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2008