Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:51:01 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! |
| |
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > groups like Memory, Disk Space, Sockets might make > sense though, although we never had a single request > for any overlapping in the resource management (while > we have quite a few users of overlapping Network spaces)
If we have to provide this flexibilty of different groupings for different resources, then I dont see how we can get to the limit with less than 3 dereferences (unless we bloat the task_struct to point to the various limit structures directly).
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |