![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:35:19 +0200 (CEST), Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I think I see an issue here. Imagine that you boot a system initially with > one keyboard connected (usb, ps/2, doesn't matter), and after some time > you connect second USB keyboard (the NumLock is 'on' on the first keyboard > when you connect the second one).> > Without your patch, the NumLock led will be OK on the second keyboard > immediately. With your patch, the NumLock will be forced to 'off' and it > will be out of sync with the first keyboard. The leds will get in sync > later when any change occurs. Oh, right, I missed it. The difficulty is how I rely on usages and fields being already mapped by hidinput_configure_usage(). Thanks for letting me know, I'll think about it. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-01 00:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||