lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Interface for the new fallocate() system call
    On Fri, 30 March 2007 19:15:58 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
    > Heiko Carstens writes:
    >
    > > If possible I'd prefer the six-32-bit-args approach.
    >
    > It does mean extra unnecessary work for 64-bit platforms, though...

    Wouldn't that work be confined to fallocate()? If I understand Heiko
    correctly, the alternative would slow s390 down for every syscall,
    including more performance-critical ones.

    Jörn

    --
    tglx1 thinks that joern should get a (TM) for "Thinking Is Hard"
    -- Thomas Gleixner
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-30 14:45    [W:0.022 / U:0.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site