![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
linux@horizon.com wrote: >>But if you didn't notice until now, then the current implementation >>must be pretty reasonable for you use as well. > > > Oh, I definitely noticed. As soon as I tried to port my application > to 2.6, it broke - as evidenced by my complaints last year. The > current solution is simple - since it's running on dedicated boxes, > leave them on 2.4. Well I didn't know that was a change in behaviour vs 2.4 (or maybe I did and forgot). That was probably a bit silly, unless there was a good reason for it. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-29 07:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||