Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:59:42 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch resend v4] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write |
| |
linux@horizon.com wrote: >>But if you didn't notice until now, then the current implementation >>must be pretty reasonable for you use as well. > > > Oh, I definitely noticed. As soon as I tried to port my application > to 2.6, it broke - as evidenced by my complaints last year. The > current solution is simple - since it's running on dedicated boxes, > leave them on 2.4.
Well I didn't know that was a change in behaviour vs 2.4 (or maybe I did and forgot). That was probably a bit silly, unless there was a good reason for it.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |