lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 29 Mar 2007 14:59:42 +1000
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: [patch resend v4] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
linux@horizon.com wrote:
>>But if you didn't notice until now, then the current implementation
>>must be pretty reasonable for you use as well.
> 
> 
> Oh, I definitely noticed.  As soon as I tried to port my application
> to 2.6, it broke - as evidenced by my complaints last year.  The
> current solution is simple - since it's running on dedicated boxes,
> leave them on 2.4.

Well I didn't know that was a change in behaviour vs 2.4 (or maybe I
did and forgot). That was probably a bit silly, unless there was a
good reason for it.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-29 07:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008