Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc5] MSI: read-flush MSI-X table | Date | Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:37:27 -0700 | From | "Williams, Mitch A" <> |
| |
Eric W. Biederman wrote: >The practical question in my book is do we set the enable/disable >methods to the same functions as the mask/unmask methods or >do we let them default to the crazy delayed disable scenario. > >Given that we do have a tiny race where we need to ensure the >MSI is disabled before we unregister it, we don't know of any >MSI implementation problems that will result in a screaming IRQ. >I would say set enable/disable to the mask/unmask methods. >
OK, that's easy. I'll whip up a patch today, test it overnight, and post it tomorrow.
Thanks for looking at this.
-Mitch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |