[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> I'd like to see this patch implement/fix touch_cpu_softlockup_watchdog
> and touch_softlockup_watchdog to mimic touch_nmi_watchdog's behaviour.

Why? Is that more correct? It seems to me that you're interested in
whether a specific CPU has gone and locked up. If touching the watchdog
makes it update all CPU timestamps, then you'll hide the fact that other
CPUs have locked up, won't it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-27 18:41    [W:0.077 / U:1.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site