lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
    Prarit Bhargava wrote:
    > I'd like to see this patch implement/fix touch_cpu_softlockup_watchdog
    > and touch_softlockup_watchdog to mimic touch_nmi_watchdog's behaviour.

    Why? Is that more correct? It seems to me that you're interested in
    whether a specific CPU has gone and locked up. If touching the watchdog
    makes it update all CPU timestamps, then you'll hide the fact that other
    CPUs have locked up, won't it?

    J
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-27 18:41    [W:0.029 / U:60.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site