[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
    Prarit Bhargava wrote:
    > I'd like to see this patch implement/fix touch_cpu_softlockup_watchdog
    > and touch_softlockup_watchdog to mimic touch_nmi_watchdog's behaviour.

    Why? Is that more correct? It seems to me that you're interested in
    whether a specific CPU has gone and locked up. If touching the watchdog
    makes it update all CPU timestamps, then you'll hide the fact that other
    CPUs have locked up, won't it?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-27 18:41    [W:0.044 / U:75.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site