lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 2/3] remove throttle_vm_writeout()
FromMiklos Szeredi <>
DateMon, 26 Mar 2007 10:35:23 +0200
> > > > Remove this function.  It's purpose was to limit the global number of
> > writeback pages from submitted by direct reclaim.  But this is equally
> > well accomplished by limited queue lengths.  When this function was
> > added, the device queues had much larger default lengths (8192
> > requests, now it's 128), causing problems.> > This changelog is wrong.> > Yes, the _default_ depth of CFQ was decreased.  But it is trivial for the
> user to inrcrease the queue depth again, and we'd prefer that the VM not
> shit itself in response.> > Plus, more significantly, the queue is per-disk.  A system with many disks
> will easily be able to cover all memory with under-writeback pages. 
> Which is why the level of under-writeback memory is controlled at a higher
> level.> > These variables are why we must not reply upon per-queue throttling in
> VFS/MM/VM.> > > All that being said, the patch (with a new, correct changlog) is OK.  This
> is because we now control the amount of dirty memory in the machine by
> running balance_dirty_pages() at first-write-fault time.  So we can no
> longer get into the situation where all memory is dirty+writeback.
Well, sort of.  I think you are not taking SwapCache pages into
account, which just pop up out of nothing to be turned into writeback
pages.

So I think removing this function still relies on limited queues, or
some other method of limiting writeback.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-26 10:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2008