![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 06:30:34PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > > > I'd say "feature", glibc's malloc also returns an address on > > > malloc(0). > > > > > This is implementation defined-the standard allows for return of either > > null or an address. > > Entirely for entertainment: AIX (5.3) returns NULL, IRIX returns a valid > address. > That's interesting, so many different behaviors! Personally, I still prefer when malloc(0) returns zero because it makes it easier to catch errors. -- -Stephane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-26 10:13 [W:2.598 / U:0.190 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||