![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> What I'm proposing we do is move the irq allocation code out of > pci_enable_device and the irq freeing code out of pci_disable_device > in the future. Sounds rational ... in a world that wasn't dominated by PCI it would seem to be the logical approach (since the irq code would have much more utility independent of the PCI code). > Tony, Len before we merge any fixes for 2.6.21-rcX I'd like to at > least get an ack on the long term direction. Long-term-direction-acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-26 22:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||