[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:32:09AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Seems OK, although I think kprobes should not be using notify_die.
> The set of events that kprobes is interested in has no intersection at
> all with the set that any other consumer of the notify_die events is
> interested in, on any architecture.
> Furthermore, the multiplexing of the kprobes events through notify_die
> really serves no useful purpose. It just means that
> kprobe_exceptions_notify has to demultiplex the events with a switch
> statement. There is no significant common code for all events in
> kprobe_exceptions_notify, just a simple check whether the event
> happened in user mode.
> However, all that is in arch code so can be changed per-arch if
> desired.

I tend to agree. Unfortunately powers higher than me like these
horrible notifier schemes. Then again at least the die path is not
performance critical unlike the page faul path where I still need a
comment for you on getting rid of the notifier.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-26 15:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans