Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:27:38 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 12:15 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>: > > Subject: Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2) > > > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 10:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Can you please test the following: > > > > > > > > Add "clocksource=acpi_pm" to the kernel commandline. > > > > > > > > If this does not change anything, then disable CONFIG_HPET and retry. > > > > > > I have: > > > $ grep CONFIG_HPET .config > > > CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y > > > CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y > > > # CONFIG_HPET is not set > > > > > > so I think all these tests were done with CONFIG_HPET=n. > > > > Gack. Please turn off CONFIG_HPET_TIMER and CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC > > Okay ... although they are in defconfig for i386, and they did not create > problems in 2.6.20.
I know, but we are looking for a regression and the hpet related code _has_ changed.
> > > Given this, does it still make sense to test clocksource=acpi_pm? > > > > Yes. > > With or without CONFIG_HPET_TIMER?
with, as a first test.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |